<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waves are great fun</title>
	<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/06/12/waves-are-great-fun/</link>
	<description>What associations do you have with waves?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nadja</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/06/12/waves-are-great-fun/#comment-3612</link>
		<dc:creator>nadja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/06/12/waves-are-great-fun/#comment-3612</guid>
		<description>@ Anne

You're right. It would be a good idea to write a more technical guideline as well. I agree that the big pictures look great - it's only a problem if they are so big that the right side-bar is covered or (worse) so heavy that the browser crashes.

But neither seems to be the case with these great, playful waves.

I look at the guidelines as soon as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Anne</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right. It would be a good idea to write a more technical guideline as well. I agree that the big pictures look great - it&#8217;s only a problem if they are so big that the right side-bar is covered or (worse) so heavy that the browser crashes.</p>
<p>But neither seems to be the case with these great, playful waves.</p>
<p>I look at the guidelines as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/06/12/waves-are-great-fun/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/06/12/waves-are-great-fun/#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>Ehm, I have a question myself with regard to upload of these photo 500 px wide- Do you have a general guideline for the size of uploaded photos? I thought they looked best in big size due to the details and they seem to fit fine in both Firefox and IE... but perhaps you have a policy with regard to that... 

The guideline I found was not technical...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehm, I have a question myself with regard to upload of these photo 500 px wide- Do you have a general guideline for the size of uploaded photos? I thought they looked best in big size due to the details and they seem to fit fine in both Firefox and IE&#8230; but perhaps you have a policy with regard to that&#8230; </p>
<p>The guideline I found was not technical&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

