<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Royal Wave # 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/</link>
	<description>What associations do you have with waves?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fik Mary en pige eller fÃ¸dte kronprinsessen Danmarks fÃ¸rste prinsesse i 61 Ã¥r? &#171; Nadjas Reflexioner</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>Fik Mary en pige eller fÃ¸dte kronprinsessen Danmarks fÃ¸rste prinsesse i 61 Ã¥r? &#171; Nadjas Reflexioner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>[...] Og hvad betyder det sÃ¥ med en lille prinsesse, fremfor endnu en prins? Helt nÃ¸gternt set er det vildt heldigt for alle parter, at der er tale om en lille prinsesse denne gang. Det tager - ifÃ¸lge opdragelsesguruen Sigrid Rise i et af BilledBladene op til den kongelige fÃ¸dsel - et stort pres af Prins Christian, fordi der ikke pÃ¥ samme mÃ¥de bliver sammenlignet mellem to bÃ¸rn af forskelligt kÃ¸n (og vi husker jo alle, hvordan der i sin tid var meget snak om, at Joachim havde mere konge-potentiale end Frede&#8230;og de var jo ogsÃ¥ pseudotvillinger pÃ¥ sammen mÃ¥de som Lilleprinsen og Miniprinsessen kommer til at blive).Det tager et voldsomt pres af kronprinsparret, der nu selv kan vÃ¦lge, om de skal have flere bÃ¸rn og - hvis det bliver tilfÃ¦ldet - kan vÃ¦re lige glade med barnets kÃ¸n. Havde der vÃ¦ret tale om en dreng denne gang, ville der have vÃ¦ret et vist folkekrav om en lille prinsesse. For der er bare meget mere royalt stof i en prinsesse. Flere kjoler, frisurer, dressurheste, smykker og alt det andet kongerÃ¸gelse og rygtebÃ¸lger er gjort af.    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Og hvad betyder det sÃ¥ med en lille prinsesse, fremfor endnu en prins? Helt nÃ¸gternt set er det vildt heldigt for alle parter, at der er tale om en lille prinsesse denne gang. Det tager &#8211; ifÃ¸lge opdragelsesguruen Sigrid Rise i et af BilledBladene op til den kongelige fÃ¸dsel &#8211; et stort pres af Prins Christian, fordi der ikke pÃ¥ samme mÃ¥de bliver sammenlignet mellem to bÃ¸rn af forskelligt kÃ¸n (og vi husker jo alle, hvordan der i sin tid var meget snak om, at Joachim havde mere konge-potentiale end Frede&#8230;og de var jo ogsÃ¥ pseudotvillinger pÃ¥ sammen mÃ¥de som Lilleprinsen og Miniprinsessen kommer til at blive).Det tager et voldsomt pres af kronprinsparret, der nu selv kan vÃ¦lge, om de skal have flere bÃ¸rn og &#8211; hvis det bliver tilfÃ¦ldet &#8211; kan vÃ¦re lige glade med barnets kÃ¸n. Havde der vÃ¦ret tale om en dreng denne gang, ville der have vÃ¦ret et vist folkekrav om en lille prinsesse. For der er bare meget mere royalt stof i en prinsesse. Flere kjoler, frisurer, dressurheste, smykker og alt det andet kongerÃ¸gelse og rygtebÃ¸lger er gjort af.    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadja</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>nadja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Nope - hadn&#039;t heard that one yet. But it was almost bound to be added to the list of wedding-rumours circling the city and the media these days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope &#8211; hadn&#8217;t heard that one yet. But it was almost bound to be added to the list of wedding-rumours circling the city and the media these days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pussycat</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>pussycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one that have heard rumors that Aleandra have been married before her marrige to Prins Joacim?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that have heard rumors that Aleandra have been married before her marrige to Prins Joacim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadja</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>@ Jomi: Your question has made me think and rethink the recent events quite a bit. And I think that there are so many news-waves rolling at the same time, that if you miss the first &#039;hit&#039; - when the news breaks - you may never realize that it&#039;s rolling. 

The news broke thursday noon (the Royal Family tends to always launch their news on the publishing-day of the weekly gossip-magazines - to tease them, I guess). One of the gossip-magazines actually had the unconfirmed rumour of the marriage on the front page, so the Royal Family were forced to act quickly . The official pressrelease hit the newswave at noon - and the sms&#039;es and mails spread. And the tv and radio immediately followed up.

The next morning it was already old news - and since no newspaper or media wants to be too repetitive (allthough they often are) the tabloids to be very creative in the choice of words. In stead of writing the basics - such as &quot;Princess Alexandra marries her young lover&quot; or &quot;Alexandra and Martin JÃ¸rgensen are getting married&quot; the major Danish tabloid-paper referred to the Princess as &#039;Fru JÃ¸rgensen&#039; (Mrs. JÃ¸rgensen - the very common surname of her husband to be - thus making her sound very unglamourous). 

They could only do so assuming that everybody had already heard the news - thus adding a new point to story. But if someone - like you - hadn&#039;t heard already heard the basics, they were left out. 

If you&#039;re not in the loop from the beginning, you might never get into the loop. And come to think of it that is the case with soap-operas, political debates and celebritygossip as well. If you follow them closely every little ripple is of major importance - if you don&#039;t it takes a tsunami to catch your attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jomi: Your question has made me think and rethink the recent events quite a bit. And I think that there are so many news-waves rolling at the same time, that if you miss the first &#8216;hit&#8217; &#8211; when the news breaks &#8211; you may never realize that it&#8217;s rolling. </p>
<p>The news broke thursday noon (the Royal Family tends to always launch their news on the publishing-day of the weekly gossip-magazines &#8211; to tease them, I guess). One of the gossip-magazines actually had the unconfirmed rumour of the marriage on the front page, so the Royal Family were forced to act quickly . The official pressrelease hit the newswave at noon &#8211; and the sms&#8217;es and mails spread. And the tv and radio immediately followed up.</p>
<p>The next morning it was already old news &#8211; and since no newspaper or media wants to be too repetitive (allthough they often are) the tabloids to be very creative in the choice of words. In stead of writing the basics &#8211; such as &#8220;Princess Alexandra marries her young lover&#8221; or &#8220;Alexandra and Martin JÃ¸rgensen are getting married&#8221; the major Danish tabloid-paper referred to the Princess as &#8216;Fru JÃ¸rgensen&#8217; (Mrs. JÃ¸rgensen &#8211; the very common surname of her husband to be &#8211; thus making her sound very unglamourous). </p>
<p>They could only do so assuming that everybody had already heard the news &#8211; thus adding a new point to story. But if someone &#8211; like you &#8211; hadn&#8217;t heard already heard the basics, they were left out. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not in the loop from the beginning, you might never get into the loop. And come to think of it that is the case with soap-operas, political debates and celebritygossip as well. If you follow them closely every little ripple is of major importance &#8211; if you don&#8217;t it takes a tsunami to catch your attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jomi</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>jomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I live in Copenhagen and i HAVE been out of my flat lately. I HAVE been communicating and reading newspapers - but i did not get hit by that royal wave and i am very surprised. It makes me think of this lady i know - She succeeded in not hearing about the London tube terror bombing for a whole day and night... why are we hit by those waves and why are we not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Copenhagen and i HAVE been out of my flat lately. I HAVE been communicating and reading newspapers &#8211; but i did not get hit by that royal wave and i am very surprised. It makes me think of this lady i know &#8211; She succeeded in not hearing about the London tube terror bombing for a whole day and night&#8230; why are we hit by those waves and why are we not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v.navarro</title>
		<link>http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>v.navarro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shareabrainwave.net/2007/02/11/the-royal-wave-2/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Give this woman credit. She has the courage to follow her bliss. She marries into &quot;royalty.&quot; Falls from grace. Trusts her heart and makes the hero&#039;s journey home. It&#039;s the stuff of myths from American Indians to medieval European ballads and African story telling.Not something we believe in today, but a mythic hero&#039;s journey, none the less. And that makes waves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give this woman credit. She has the courage to follow her bliss. She marries into &#8220;royalty.&#8221; Falls from grace. Trusts her heart and makes the hero&#8217;s journey home. It&#8217;s the stuff of myths from American Indians to medieval European ballads and African story telling.Not something we believe in today, but a mythic hero&#8217;s journey, none the less. And that makes waves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

